There are 6000+ symbols because we need to account for every manufacturer, every nozzle, and times multiple symbol family options.
So like I said, if you generate a schedule at the beginning of each project, you can confirm the symbols are correct, and be on your way.
While I could appreciate a 15 minute loss for each project, that is a bit of an overstatement. The last project I see you assembled a few days ago, there was barely 5 minutes spent assembling the equipment. With the massive savings across the rest of the project lifespan, that 5 minutes is well spent in guaranteeing accurate data.
Here's a classic example, also quite recent -- just yesterday we modified the performance data for the Rain Bird SQ nozzles. Although the catalog has data for them at 40 and 50 psi, that was causing issues with them being bundled with the 1800's. So the question is, if we had some sort of "managed template" for users, what would happen to the SQ nozzles in existing templates? I mention that, as it immediately becomes a vastly complicated situation. Another classic example, perhaps a user wants to maintain a template that has the older Hunter nozzle numbers, as they are a distributor and that is what is in stock. Meanwhile, other uses want their I-40 nozzles to reflect the latest data.
So the template thing is just quite complicated, that will necessitate an incredible amount of work. In the meantime, 5 minutes per project is all we ask.
--J