Charles,

We can take a look at getting this into the lineup, but if I may ask, what is it that you are trying to achieve with this?

Jake,

When we do head spots (coverage plan we call it) we place the flow totals on the plan so our production team can come up with the valve count. We don't use the valve count in the flow total. We edit that out. See screen shot. http://www.screencast.com/t/nX98zcrWA8B

Charles

Charles,
Thank you for the response. The link, however, did not work. Could you please try sending that screenshot again so we can take a look at what you were describing? Thanks!

Charles,

Since it is just used internally, you should be able to use the CHSPACE command to move it to PaperSpace.
That won't address the upper-case issue, however.
I would be curious what math your production team is doing differently than the flow total itself -- doesn't it seem that ideally you are asking if the valve count can match that same way that you total your valves?

--J

Try this one.

http://www.screencast.com/t/QC9dqrUJLBs

We manually alter the drip totals as well since the flow total won't recognize the dripline.

Jeremiah Farmer wrote:

Charles,

Since it is just used internally, you should be able to use the CHSPACE command to move it to PaperSpace.
That won't address the upper-case issue, however.
I would be curious what math your production team is doing differently than the flow total itself -- doesn't it seem that ideally you are asking if the valve count can match that same way that you total your valves?

--J

I don't handle the production side for our Project Services division, but I think there are scenarios where they may want to add an extra valve or 2 and don't want it to mismatch what is shown on the plan. That is why they asked me to remove the valve count.